Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/5/1991
State v. Hicks
Citations
- 407 S.E.2d 907
- 305 S.C. 277
- 1991 S.C. App. LEXIS 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although charges requested by a party may be a correct statement of law, a judge does not err by refusing to deliver the charges verbatim
- evidence defendant was drinking, had driven off roadway, did not stop at scene, and did not report incident to authorities sufficient evidence of recklessness to uphold denial of motion for directed verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Gardner, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gaskins v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 88×
- State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-22· cited 58×
- State v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-01· cited 33×
- Suber v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-01-16· cited 15×
- State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-07-08· cited 13×
- In the Interest of Stacy Ray A.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-01-21· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.