State v. Hess
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3755
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress evidence related to his driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs the arresting officer had a reasonable articulable suspicion that appellant was impaired from marijuana use, which justified field sobriety testing. There was no evidence that the arresting officer failed to substantially comply with National Highway Traffic Safety Administration standards when he conducted the field sobriety tests. Accordingly, the record supported the trial court's finding that probable cause existed to arrest appellant for driving under the influence, based upon his failure to correctly perform the field sobriety tests. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. BoczarOhio Supreme Court· 2007-04-04· cited 147×
- State v. SantiagoOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-14· cited 25×
- State v. GladmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-13· cited 19×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-06· cited 11×
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-22· cited 9×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-22· cited 5×
- State v. AicherOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11· cited 4×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-05· cited 4×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.