Skip to main content
· 9/25/1998

State v. Parmar

Citations

  • 586 N.W.2d 279
  • 255 Neb. 356
  • 1998 Neb. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing procedure is jurisdictional; petition must be filed in the office of the clerk of the district court
  • filing procedure is jurisdictional; petition must be filed in the office of the clerk of the district court
  • abrogated in part by statute as recognized in State v. Dallmann, 260 Neb. 937, 621 N.W.2d 86 (2000)
  • “We decline to adopt the ‘prisoner delivery rule’ and conclude that prisoners acting pro se are subject to the same filing rules as other litigants.”
  • “Thus, there is no statutory basis on which to conclude that the ‘prison delivery rule’ applies in Nebraska. . . . We decline to adopt the ‘prisoner delivery rule’ -9- and conclude that prisoners acting pro se are subject to the same filing rules as other litigants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Irwin, Inbody, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.