Skip to main content

State v. Hernandez

Citations

  • 197 Conn. App. 257

Syllabus

The defendant, who had been convicted of assault in the first degree, appealed to this court. Following the defendant's conviction, the trial court scheduled sentencing and granted a motion filed by the state to increase the defendant's bond, reasoning that the defendant faced a substantial prison sentence and had a strong incentive not to appear at sentencing. Thereafter, the defendant posted his bond and the court granted his request for a thirty day continuance of his sentencing. The defendant subsequently failed to appear for sentencing on the date that he had requested, and the court sentenced the defendant in his absence. Held that the defendant could not prevail on his unpreserved claim that the trial court violated his constitutional right to be present at all critical stages of the prosecution when it sentenced him in abstentia: the defen- dant was unable to demonstrate that a constitutional violation existed because he waived his constitutional right to be present at sentencing by deliberately absenting himself from the proceedings, and, while the defendant's failure to appear for sentencing alone satisfied waiver, addi- tional evidence demonstrated that the defendant knew that he was required to be present at sentencing and knowingly and voluntarily relinquished his right to be present; the defendant specifically requested a continuance of sentencing, and at no point asserted that he was unaware that he needed to be present for sentencing or that he did not know when sentencing was scheduled, and, as the court articulated, the defendant demonstrated a cavalier attitude toward the sentencing process, leaving the court unclear as to whether the defendant would appear, and, accordingly, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's later request, made on the day of sentencing through defense counsel, to move sentencing back to later that day; moreover, the court did not improperly fail to make an express finding that the defendant had wai

Judges: Keller; Elgo; Pellegrino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.