State v. Hendrickson
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3324
Syllabus
Sentencing maximum sentence R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 R.C. 2929.14 ineffective assistance of counsel mitigation uncharged conduct increased sentence. When a criminal defendant was not convicted of a repeat violent offender specification or ordered to serve consecutive sentences, trial courts are not required to make findings under R.C. 2929.14. Further, trial courts are not required to make any findings under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel because, contrary to appellant's argument, his trial counsel did argue mitigation at sentencing. Finally, there is no support in the record for appellant's argument that the trial court improperly increased his prison sentence based on uncharged conduct.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-16· cited 70×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-03-15· cited 57×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-12· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.