Skip to main content

State v. Hendrickson

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3324

Syllabus

Sentencing maximum sentence R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 R.C. 2929.14 ineffective assistance of counsel mitigation uncharged conduct increased sentence. When a criminal defendant was not convicted of a repeat violent offender specification or ordered to serve consecutive sentences, trial courts are not required to make findings under R.C. 2929.14. Further, trial courts are not required to make any findings under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel because, contrary to appellant's argument, his trial counsel did argue mitigation at sentencing. Finally, there is no support in the record for appellant's argument that the trial court improperly increased his prison sentence based on uncharged conduct.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.