State v. Hendrickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a nunc pro tunc order allows a court to date a record reflecting its action back to the time the action in fact occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frongillo v. Bank of STX, inc.
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2026-03-09· cited 1×
• State v. James Greer Daly
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-06-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Presidential Estates Apartment Associates v. Barrett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 72×
• State v. Smissaert
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 50×
• State v. Snapp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-01-06· cited 34×
• Barros v. Barros
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-09· cited 14×
• State v. Petrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-09-18· cited 9×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-30· cited 6×
• Schulze v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1906-02-16· cited 5×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-06-06· cited 2×