Schulze v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.

Citations

• 41 Wash. 614
• 84 P. 587
• 1906 Wash. LEXIS 1020

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Pasties—Right to Appeal.' Ah order correcting a judgment by eliminating the names of certain parties inadvertently included, who were dismissed from the action before judgment, thereby making the judgment speak the truth, is not appealable by 'the other judgment debtors, as it does not affect their rights, the time for appealing from the original judgment having expired.</p> <p>Same — Pasties Aggeieved. Where part of the defendants are dismissed from an action before ’ judgment, and a judgment inadvertently entered against them is subsequently corrected by an order nunc pro tuno eliminating their names, they are not parties aggrieved by the modification, and cannot appeal therefrom.</p>