State v. Henderson

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 412

Syllabus

In child endangering case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting reports and testimony of state's medical experts. Appellants failed to show particularized need requiring the state to pay for expert assistance. Motion for acquittal was properly denied because state presented evidence going to each element of the offense. Prosecutor's remarks during closing as to witnesses' credibility did not affect outcome. Imposition of maximum sentences did not constitute error.