Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/9/1973

State v. Ballinger

Citations

504 P.2d 955
19 Ariz. App. 32
1973 Ariz. App. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defendant’s presence in house on previous day supported inference that he possessed narcotics seized when police returned with search warrant
defendant's presence in house on previous day supported inference that he possessed narcotics seized when police returned with search warrant
court has duty to instruct on lesser-included offense of possession of heroin if evidence reasonably supports conviction on that offense
court has duty to instruct on lesser-included offense of possession of heroin if evidence reasonably supports conviction on that offense
court has duty to instruct on lesser-included offense of possession of heroin if evidence reasonably supports conviction on that offense
“Possession of heroin is a lesser[-] included offense of the greater offense of possession of heroin for sale, since the second cannot be committed without necessarily committing the first.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Eubank, Haire

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.