State v. Helmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding § 13-3821 is a continuing offense that does not violate ex post facto principles because the statute “imposes continuing, lifetime duties on those required to register”
• noting continuous offenses “endure[ ] over a period of time, and [their] commission is ongoing until cessation of the proscribed conduct”
• when defendant indicted for failure to register as sex offender over period of years, continuing nature of offense allowed trial court to sentence defendant for class four felony rather than class six felony, which offense had been when originally committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Khalifa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-03· cited 51×
• People v. Lopez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-08-14· cited 22×
• State v. Flatt
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2006-10-03· cited 2×
• Lieble v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-02· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. David Charles Henry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-02-23