State v. Flatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen imposing a sentence for conviction of a misdemeanor, a trial court is not required to make findings of fact on the record in determining the percentage to be served in confinement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Tennessee v. Jim George Conaser a.k.a. Jimmy George Conaser
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2013-08-21
• State of Tennessee v. Tandrea Laquise Sanders
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2024-04-23

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Troutman
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-11-09· cited 341×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1987-05-12· cited 168×
• State v. Adams
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2000-06-30· cited 132×
• United States of America v. Johnnie C. Sullivan
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-07-11· cited 65×
• Khalifa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-03· cited 51×
• United States v. Jose Ramirez-Valencia, A.K.A. Rodolfo Ramirez-Valencia, A.K.A. Don Enrique, A.K.A. Jose Ramiro-Ramirez
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-01-31· cited 36×
• State v. Cottrell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-12-15· cited 33×
• State v. James
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-07· cited 28×
• Beeler v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1959-12-11· cited 18×
• State v. Woodson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1985-07-24· cited 11×
• State v. Helmer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-24· cited 10×