State v. Heier
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2022
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., trial court explicitly found that defendant has or is reasonably expected to have means to pay costs of confinement and appointed-counsel fees. Court was not required to explain findings. Information contained in record, including statements made at plea hearing, statements made at sentencing hearing, and information contained in PSI, support imposition of costs and assessment of fees. Assessment of appointed-counsel fees vacated for failing to comply with State v. Taylor, 2020-Ohio-6786.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 40×
- State v. VelesquezOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 15×
- State v. CantrillOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31· cited 14×
- State v. RadabaughOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-02· cited 14×
- State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-29· cited 6×
- State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.