State v. Heidenreich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s exculpatory statements were not “confessions;” trial court erred in characterizing them as such in its jury instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-16· cited 64×
• State v. Weston
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-11-22· cited 43×
• State v. Manzella
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 22×
• State v. Caseday
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1911-04-19· cited 20×
• State v. Cook
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1920-03-12· cited 19×
• State v. Wong Wen Teung
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-01-25· cited 16×
• Franklin v. Webber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1919-07-15· cited 13×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1954-05-26· cited 5×
• State v. Manzella
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-11-12· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fletcher v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1892-10-08· cited 75×
• State v. Morey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1894-01-09· cited 54×
• Covington v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1887-10-14· cited 50×
• State v. Bowker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1894-11-13· cited 31×
• People v. Parton
  California Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 30×
• Prople v. Le Roy
  California Supreme Court· 1884-09-18· cited 26×

Other cases named State v. Heidenreich

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State v. Heidenreich
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-10-29
• State v. Heidenreich
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-31