Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/4/1986
State v. Allen
Citations
- 720 P.2d 761
- 79 Or. App. 674
- 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding, inexplicably, no authority for proposition that contract law applies to review of plea agreement and noting that the plea agreement did not grant immunity from prosecution for murder even if the parol evidence rule applied
- finding, inexplicably, no authority for proposition that contract law applies to review of plea agreement and noting that the plea agreement did not grant immunity from prosecution for murder even if the parol evidence rule applied
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Hoomissen Young, Van Hoomissen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 87×
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court· 1921-11-22· cited 43×
- State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court· 1921-12-27· cited 39×
- State v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court· 1920-12-14· cited 23×
- Stewart v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-02-12· cited 16×
- State v. HeidenreichOregon Supreme Court· 1896-07-18· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.