State v. Heckler
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1888
Syllabus
Judicial Disqualification; Manifest Weight; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). We lack jurisdiction to consider whether a trial judge should be disqualified; however, to the extent that appellant makes due process arguments, they are not supported by the record to demonstrate bias. Convictions were not against the manifeset weight of the evidence. Appellant did not demonstrate that his consecutive sentences were clearly and convincingly contrary to law.
Judges: Waldick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 3,391×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 773×
- State v. BradshawOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-17· cited 25×
- State v. BenderOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-07· cited 8×
- State v. CorchadoCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County· 2017-06-16· cited 6×
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-20· cited 5×
- In re A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-03· cited 4×
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.