State v. Hebert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]ingle point calibration is sufficient, given the totality of the regulations, the controls mandated, and the technical nature of the gas chromatograph.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bolden
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-04-17· cited 21×
• Longman v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-03-29· cited 19×
• State v. Carter
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-09-12· cited 5×
• State v. Ruiz
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-12-30· cited 4×
• State v. Amos
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-04-29· cited 2×
• State v. Hebert
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-04-05

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Sweeney
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-11-28· cited 216×
• State v. Rowell
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-01-18· cited 55×
• State v. Tanner
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-10-15· cited 36×
• State v. Sherer
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-01-30· cited 33×
• State v. Thibodeaux
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-05-17· cited 31×
• State v. McElroy
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-12-11· cited 20×
• State v. Freeman
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-03-04· cited 12×
• State v. Pruitt
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-01-15· cited 11×
• State v. Corkran
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-03-21· cited 7×
• State v. Wilson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-10-07· cited 6×
• State v. Toussaint
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-02-04· cited 6×