Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/28/2018

State v. Hazel

Citations

2018 Ohio 5274

Syllabus

Appellant appeals from the trial court's denial of his demand to compel discovery. Whether the demand is considered as a petition seeking postconviction relief or simply as a motion to compel discovery, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling the demand. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Taylor
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-14· cited 10×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-17

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Brady v. Maryland
Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
United States v. Agurs
Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
State v. Johnston
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
State v. Perkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-02· cited 26×
State v. Hazel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-02· cited 16×
Riverside v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 15×
State v. Hazel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-18· cited 6×
State v. Owensby
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-27· cited 5×
State v. Hazel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-23· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.