Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/23/2018
State v. Hazel
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 766
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant's counsel filed a brief under the authority of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) with Defendant-appellant filing a pro se brief. A thorough review of the record reveals no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoNinth Circuit· 1974-07-19· cited 264×
- State v. HazelOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-02· cited 16×
- State v. HazelOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-18· cited 6×
- State v. TubbsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.