Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/23/2018
State v. Hayward
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1070
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying Hayward's motion to suppress, and the sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence supported Hayward's convictions.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 413×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 348×
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 219×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-10· cited 126×
- State v. MahoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 70×
- State v. DempseyOhio Supreme Court· 1970-06-03· cited 20×
- State v. HaywardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.