State v. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the parties’ disagreement as to the precise length of delay did not need to be addressed because, in either instance, it would have been deemed presumptively prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. O'NEAL
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-12-18· cited 40×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• State v. Laney
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 115×
• Salandre v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-02-11· cited 107×
• Zurla v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-01-25· cited 105×
• State v. Manzanares
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 44×
• State v. Kilpatrick
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-06-19· cited 34×
• State v. Brown
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-06-24· cited 33×
• State v. Garcia
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-06-05· cited 29×
• State v. Johnson
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-20· cited 29×
• State v. Lujan
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-05-28· cited 17×