Skip to main content
· 2/11/1991

Salandre v. State

Citations

  • 806 P.2d 562
  • 111 N.M. 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that restraints on the defendant's liberty were not \oppressive\ where he was under restrictions of bond for only about a month after being released from incarceration on other charges
  • concluding that it was a \close case\ but that the defendant's speedy trial rights were violated where the prejudice was slight and the other three factors weighed in his favor \but not heavily\
  • holding that although prejudice was slight, on balance speedy trial violation took place
  • holding that restraints on the defendant’s liberty were not “oppressive” where he was under restrictions of bond for only about a month after being released from incarceration on other charges
  • concluding that it was a “close case” but that the defendant’s speedy trial rights were violated where the prejudice was slight and the other three factors weighed in his favor “but not heavily”
  • concluding that it 6 was a “close case” but that the defendant’s speedy trial rights were violated where the 7 prejudice was slight and the other three factors weighed in his favor “but not 8 heavily”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ransom, Sosa, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.