State v. Hawthorne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing defendant's claim that verdicts were legally inconsistent without specifying whether claim was raised in trial court or preserved for review
• addressing defendant’s claim that verdicts were legally inconsistent without specifying whether claim was raised in trial court or preserved for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bjorklund
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-23· cited 12×
• State v. Johnson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-09-04· cited 11×
• State v. Kuranko
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-20· cited 9×
• State v. Jones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-03-12· cited 8×
• State v. Chyung
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-04-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 108×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-21· cited 23×
• State v. Glover
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-02-20· cited 14×