State v. Hawkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing court may not rule on alleged error in exclusion of testimony unless record on appeal shows fairly what the rejected testimony would have been
• where the defendant did not object to the argument and there was no motion for mistrial, the issue regarding improper argument could not be raised on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barroso
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-06-12· cited 16×
• State v. Curry
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-09· cited 12×
• State v. Ballington
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-05-29· cited 11×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-08-05

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dawkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 69×
• State v. Owens
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-07-06· cited 61×
• State v. Lytchfield
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-01-02· cited 41×
• Ward v. Epting
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-01· cited 39×
• State v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-08· cited 38×
• State v. Rabon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-01· cited 33×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 18×
• State v. Elmore
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-21· cited 18×
• Merritt v. Grant
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-20· cited 14×
• State v. Keenan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-10-07· cited 12×
• Barrett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-11-03· cited 10×
• State v. Bendoly
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-10· cited 5×
• State v. Hamlet
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-30· cited 4×
• State v. Cox
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-10-30· cited 1×