North Dakota Supreme Court· 12/6/1988

State v. Haverluk

Citations

432 N.W.2d 871
1988 N.D. LEXIS 229
1988 WL 129559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding a statute' increasing criminal penalties for multiple DUI offenses did not apply retroactively by relying on offenses occurring before the statute’s effective date to increase the penalty of an offense occurring subsequent to that date
holding a statute increasing criminal penalties for multiple DUI offenses did not apply retroactively by relying on offenses occurring before the statute’s effective date to increase the penalty of an offense occurring subsequent to that date
stating a “statute is not regarded as operating retroactively because of the mere fact that it relates to antecedent events.”
stating a “statute is not regarded as operating retroactively because of the mere fact that it relates to antecedent events.”
stating a “statute is applied prospectively when it is applied to a cause of action that arose subsequent to the effective date of the statute.”
stating a “statute is applied prospectively when it is applied to a cause of action that arose subsequent to the effective date of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gierke, Levine, Erickstad, Vande Walle Meschke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.