State v. Hauck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no inconsistency where jury found defendant guilty of first degree robbery for displaying what appeared to be a deadly weapon but found, by special interrogatory, that defendant was not armed with a deadly weapon
• discussion of meaning of \armed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gurske
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 55×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Brockie
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-09-26· cited 55×
• State v. Sabala
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-07-22· cited 38×
• State v. Randle
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-18· cited 36×
• State v. Lubers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-10· cited 34×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-07· cited 23×
• State v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-15· cited 15×
• State v. Eker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-03-15· cited 10×
• In re Pers. Restraint of Brockie
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-09-26

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tongate
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 81×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-14· cited 52×