Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/30/1986
State v. Hatch
Citations
- 724 S.W.2d 643
- 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 5125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permissible for trial court to clarify juror’s initial “No” response
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berrey, Manford, Shangler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DoddMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-12-07· cited 44×
- Lattisaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-11· cited 25×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-01-22· cited 13×
- State v. ConwayMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-10-06· cited 13×
- State v. FrederickMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-01-23· cited 10×
- Carver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-09-07· cited 9×
- State v. BarlowMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-02-28· cited 4×
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MATTHEW SCOTT O'LEARYMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-04-16
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robert Earl Williams v. United States of America, Gerald Coleman v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-10-23· cited 68×
- United States v. Horace Lamar Edwards and Ronald CliftonFifth Circuit· 1972-12-04· cited 58×
- Lucien v. Amos v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1974-06-04· cited 50×
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-04-15· cited 44×
- United States v. Clarence Christian NelsonNinth Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 33×
- State v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-01-21· cited 18×
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-10-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.