Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/8/1911
State v. Haskell
Citations
- 84 Vt. 429
- 79 A. 852
- 1911 Vt. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mill regulation must be \based upon some difference having a reasonable and just relation to the object sought\
- mill regulation must be “based upon some difference having a reasonable and just relation to the object sought”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Munson, Powers, Rowell, Watson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-12-20· cited 168×
- Moran v. BowleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1932-01-13· cited 49×
- Sabre v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont· 1913-01-21· cited 45×
- Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-01-28· cited 37×
- Hazen v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1918-11-08· cited 32×
- Vermont Woolen Corporation v. WackermanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1961-01-06· cited 21×
- State v. RacineSupreme Court of Vermont· 1974-12-03· cited 17×
- City of Burlington v. Jay Lee, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1972-04-04· cited 3×
- Bondi v. MacKaySupreme Court of Vermont· 1913-12-10· cited 2×
- Jones v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont· 1923-01-04· cited 2×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 1,398×
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 909×
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 399×
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1888-04-09· cited 387×
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court· 1888-04-23· cited 246×
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court· 1904-05-02· cited 237×
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1897-03-01· cited 178×
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1903-01-05· cited 177×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1896-03-30· cited 126×
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County Nat. Bank of LibertySupreme Court· 1907-12-02· cited 105×
- United States v. Des Moines Navigation & Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1892-01-11· cited 94×
- St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1902-04-14· cited 79×
- Erb v. MoraschSupreme Court· 1900-05-14· cited 75×
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court· 1897-04-03· cited 64×
- State v. ScampiniSupreme Court of Vermont· 1904-11-15· cited 36×
- Payne v. SheetsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1903-06-27· cited 24×
- State v. DodgeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1904-01-26· cited 24×
- State v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Vermont· 1898-05-15· cited 19×
- State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont· 1905-10-25· cited 19×
- State v. PaigeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1906-02-01· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.