State v. Hart
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4550
Syllabus
Appellant's statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights were not violated. His convictions for improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation, aggravated possession of drugs, failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer, having weapons while under disability, tampering with evidence, improper handling of a firearm in a motor vehicle, and falsification were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in failing to merge having weapons while under disability with improper handling of a firearm in a motor vehicle or in imposing court costs and restitution. The trial court did not err by denying appellant's request to proceed pro se. However, the sentence imposed was not in compliance with the Reagan Tokes Act. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SweeneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-06· cited 6×
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-27· cited 3×
- State v. PiraniOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-12· cited 2×
- State v. JacksOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-18· cited 2×
- State v. HumphreysOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-06· cited 1×
- State v. FarlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.