State v. Harrison
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 407
Syllabus
Appellant appeals pro se from his convictions for felonious assault, improper handling of a firearm in a motor vehicle, and having weapons while under disability. The record does not demonstrate ineffective assistance of trial counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, or judicial bias. The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion for a new trial without an evidentiary hearing, the reasons for which were appropriately set forth on the record and in its written decision on the motion. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 830×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-27· cited 313×
- Simmons v. Goodwill Industries of Akron, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-04-02· cited 226×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 160×
- State v. DeanOhio Supreme Court· 2010-10-26· cited 115×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-21· cited 36×
- State v. LillicrapOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-15· cited 4×
- State v. ShouseOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.