State v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant was prejudiced when based on the evidence at trial, a different verdict might have been reached if the jury had been charged with the instruction requested by the defendant
• “To warrant reversal, a [circuit court’s] refusal to give a requested jury charge must be both erroneous and prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Adkins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 88×
• State v. Condrey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-01· cited 56×
• STALK v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
• State v. Lee-Grigg
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 22×
• State v. Reese
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-03· cited 11×
• State v. Dantonio
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-01-16· cited 7×
• State v. Niles
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-09-12· cited 4×
• State v. Crosby
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-17· cited 3×
• Pantovich v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-08-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Burriss
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-16· cited 97×
• State v. Hughey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-07-06· cited 60×
• State v. Ballenger
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 47×
• State v. Austin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-06· cited 40×
• State v. Muhammed
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-11-22· cited 20×
• State v. Peay
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 17×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-07-20· cited 9×
• State v. Barth
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1886-07-06· cited 3×