Oregon Supreme Court· 8/18/2005

State v. Harris

Citations

118 P.3d 236
339 Or. 157
2005 Ore. LEXIS 512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that juvenile adjudications are not convictions under Oregon law and may not be used as sentence enhancement factors unless admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury
holding that juvenile adjudications are not convictions under Oregon law and may not be used as sentence enhancement factors unless admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury
holding that, to be valid, the waiver of a jury trial must be shown to be an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right
explaining that such a waiver must show “an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege” (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)
explaining that such a waiver must show “an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege” (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)
explaining that such a waiver must show “an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege” (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.