State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming restitution where but for the defendant’s conduct in driving, the victim would not have been struck and killed
• “The State must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim’s loss would not have occurred ‘but for’ the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Of Washington v. John B. Velezmoro
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-10-31· cited 8×
• Brianna Marie Peterson v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-10-15· cited 6×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. ANTHONY LEVERN WAITERS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-09-23

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Personal Restraint of Stenson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 191×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Stenson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 175×
• State v. Irby
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 170×
• State v. Krall
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 139×
• Daniels v. Woodford
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-02· cited 139×
• State v. Tobin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 119×
• United States v. Carlos Adelzo-Gonzalez
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-26· cited 110×
• State v. Enstone
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 104×
• United States v. Trung Tran Nguyen
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-28· cited 99×
• State v. Griffith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-11-06· cited 98×
• State v. Hartwell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-19· cited 44×
• Schuette v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-20· cited 32×
• State v. LaFlam
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-21· cited 22×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-17· cited 14×
• State v. Shannahan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-18· cited 12×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1986-02-24· cited 7×