Supreme Court of Iowa· 8/24/2007

State v. Harris

Citations

741 N.W.2d 1
2007 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 106
2007 WL 2404724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the defendant’s statement, “I don’t want to talk about it. We’re going to do it with a lawyer. That’s the way I got to go,” was sufficient to invoke his right to counsel
finding “I don’t want to talk about it. We’re going to do it with a lawyer” was an invocation
characterizing statements to “get it out on the table” and “[t]ell us what really happened” as “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response” (quoting Innis, 446 U.S. at 301, 100 S. Ct. at 1689, 64 L. Ed. 2d at 308 (third quote))
characterizing statements to “get it out on the table” and “[t]ell us what really happened” as “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response” (quoting Innis, 446 U.S. at 301, 100 S. Ct. at 1689, 64 L. Ed. 2d at 308 (third quote))
“We’re going to do it with a lawyer. That’s the way I got to go.”
“Officers have no obligation to stop questioning an individual who makes an ambiguous or equivocal request for an attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.