Wisconsin Supreme Court· 3/28/1996

State v. Harrell

Citations

546 N.W.2d 115
199 Wis. 2d 654
1996 Wisc. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that government attorneys lack “financial” or “reputational” interest in case handled by another attorney in office that partner in law firm would have
reviewing and affirming the circuit court judge's denial of a recusal motion; addressing the merits objectively under Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(a) and addressing whether the judge made the required subjective determination under Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g)
reviewing and affirming the circuit court judge's denial of a recusal motion; addressing the merits objectively under Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(a) and addressing whether the judge made the required subjective determination under Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g)
\The trial judge's declaration that he was not biased satisfies the subjective test.\
Steinmetz, J., unanimous decision reviewing a circuit court judge's decision not to disqualify himself
Steinmetz, J., unanimous decision reviewing a circuit court judge's decision not to disqualify himself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald W. Steinmetz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.