State v. Harper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction and remanding for new trial where record did not reflect consideration of the defendant's reasons for a continuance
• reversing and remanding for a new trial where there record did not reflect that the trial court had considered whether the requested continuance was reasonable
• reversing and remanding where the record did not indicate that the trial court considered whether the defendant’s request for a continuance was reasonable under the circumstances
• “As an essential predicate, the court should consider on the record whether the request for a postponement is reasonable in the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-24· cited 14×
• A. D. L. and Lane
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-19· cited 11×
• Dep't of Human Servs. v. N. J. V. (In re A. N. O.-V.)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-07· cited 6×
• Phillips v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-08· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hickey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-30· cited 29×
• State v. Schmick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-16· cited 13×
• State v. Lingren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-14· cited 13×
• State v. Zaha
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-21· cited 8×