Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/6/1989
State v. Harper
Citations
- 376 S.E.2d 272
- 297 S.C. 257
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting \[c]ontempt is an extreme measure and the power to adjudge in contempt is not to be lightly asserted\
- noting a conviction for criminal contempt requires the \willful commission of an undue disturbance\ (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court· 1919-04-14· cited 251×
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court· 1962-06-18· cited 222×
- Bigham v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-03-13· cited 33×
- Brasington v. ShannonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-26· cited 20×
- State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-04-03· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.