Ex Parte Hudgings
Citations
- 249 U.S. 378
- 39 S. Ct. 337
- 63 L. Ed. 656
- 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2091
- 11 A.L.R. 333
Syllabus
<p>The basis of the power of the federal courts to punish summarily for contempt committed in their presence is to secure them from obstruction in the performance of their judicial duties; and'to justify exertion of this power, the element of- obstruction must clearly appear. P. 3S3.</p> <p>Because perjury is punishable as a criminal pífense is rio reason why it may not also afford basis for punishment as a contempt. P. 382.</p> <p>Perjury in fade curice is not of itself punishable as contempt apart from its obstructive tendency. P. 383. ..</p> <p>Hence, a District Court has no power to adjudge a witness guilty of contempt solely because in the court’s opinion he is wilfully refusing to testify truthfully, and to .confine him until he shall purge himself by giving testimony which the court deems truthful. P. 384. -</p> <p>In such a case, held that the original jurisdiction of this court in habeas corpus was properly invoked. Id.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the contempt power exists “within the limits of and [is] sanctioned by the Constitution.... ”
- Tr. defendant’s original brief, page 5.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Pitney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
168 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 1,786×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-04-28· cited 735×
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 462×
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 438×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 426×
- Hampton v. HanrahanSeventh Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 368×
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 365×
- In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court· 2011-05-27· cited 330×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 308×
- United States v. Bobby G. SealeSeventh Circuit· 1972-07-06· cited 231×
- In Re MichaelSupreme Court· 1945-11-05· cited 230×
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court· 1962-06-18· cited 222×
- United States v. Paul C. PerkinsEleventh Circuit· 1984-12-19· cited 212×
- People v. KrihoColorado Court of Appeals· 1999-04-29· cited 207×
- United States v. BarnettSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 198×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1918-01-07· cited 172×
- Johnson v. HoySupreme Court· 1913-02-03· cited 116×
- Riggins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1905-12-11· cited 112×
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court· 1886-03-15· cited 20×
- Ex Parte MirzanSupreme Court· 1887-01-10· cited 16×
- In Re HuntingtonSupreme Court· 1890-11-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.