Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/27/2007

State v. Harp

Citations

156 P.3d 1268
283 Kan. 740
2007 Kan. LEXIS 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that district court could have construed defendant's pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence as a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion
absence of waiver circumstantial evidence defendant had not been informed of right to appeal
Ortiz exception may excuse defendant’s untimely appeal of presumptive sentence when the defendant asserts change in law, challenges severity level of crime; when a direct appeal granted under an Ortiz exception, appeal subject to law in effect at time of grant
sentence imposed for crime which has identical or overlapping elements with crime of less severe penalty not “illegal” as that term is used in K.S.A. 22-3504; Bryant v. State, 280 Kan. 2, Syl. ¶ 3, 118 P.3d 685 (2005

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Johnson, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.