State v. Harkness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while trial courts have “no inherent authority” to modify a sentence postjudgment, courts do have “limited statutory authority” to do so (emphasis added)
• a trial court has only limited statutory authority to modify a sentence postjudgment
• trial court has only limited statutory authority to modify a sentence post judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bergen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-19· cited 7×
• State v. Petterson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-03-21· cited 4×
• State of Washington v. Charlotte D. Bergen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-19
• State v. Petterson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2018-02-01
• State v. Hubbard
  Washington Supreme Court· 2023-04-27

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Grayson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-05-26· cited 232×
• State v. Shove
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-07-13· cited 112×
• State v. Williams
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 107×
• Hubbard v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 58×
• January v. Porter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-04-17· cited 57×
• State v. Murray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-09-15· cited 45×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-02· cited 15×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-30· cited 4×