Skip to main content

State v. Hare

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1931

Syllabus

MISTRIAL – DOUBLE JEOPARDY: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss the assault charge on double-jeopardy grounds where the original trial judge's declaration of a mistrial was supported by a manifest necessity the original trial judge felt that she could no longer be fair and impartial due to disagreements with defense counsel during the course of the trial.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.