Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 11/9/2010
State v. Hanson
Citations
- 790 N.W.2d 198
- 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 158
- 2010 WL 4451239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding restriction on defendant’s communication with any person under eighteen years of age with no exception for incidental communication was 6 unreasonably restrictive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crippen, Johnson, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-08-05· cited 280×
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 190×
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-16· cited 181×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-30· cited 115×
- United States v. Cornelius FranklinEighth Circuit· 1984-02-22· cited 98×
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-07-29· cited 92×
- State v. BrocksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-12-10· cited 50×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-05-20· cited 47×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-02-25· cited 16×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-05-06· cited 14×
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-08-10· cited 14×
- State v. LozarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-07-31· cited 12×
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-01· cited 10×
- State v. CollardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-03· cited 8×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.