Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/7/2012
State v. Hansen
Citations
- 253 Or. App. 407
- 290 P.3d 847
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the term “prevent” “implies that a person does some act to stop an occurrence from happening” and the term “obstruct” “implies making someone’s action more difficult, as opposed to stopping the action completely”
- concluding that the term “prevent” “implies that a person does some act to stop an occurrence from happening” and the term “obstruct” “implies making someone’s action more difficult, as opposed to stopping the action completely”
- concluding that ORS 162.325’s text requires proof that the defendant’s actions stopped or interfered with officers performing some act that might aid in apprehend- ing a suspected felon, regardless of whether the act would lead directly to the suspect’s apprehension
- concluding that ORS 162.325’s text requires proof that the defendant’s actions stopped or interfered with officers performing some act that might aid in apprehend- ing a suspected felon, regardless of whether the act would lead directly to the suspect’s apprehension
- discussing the significance of legislature’s use of both “obstruct” and “prevent” in ORS 162.325
- examining the definition of the term “obstruct” in another part of the 1971 Revised Criminal Code to deter- mine the legislature’s intent for the definition of “obstruct” in the context of ORS 162.325(1)(d)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 11×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-16· cited 5×
- State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-23· cited 2×
- State v. ScheirmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-05· cited 1×
- State v. P. T. (In re P. T.)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-05· cited 1×
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-07· cited 1×
- State v. WithnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-22· cited 233×
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court· 1994-11-25· cited 41×
- State v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-11· cited 20×
- State v. KellarOregon Supreme Court· 2011-02-17· cited 18×
- State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16· cited 18×
- State v. BarrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-15· cited 14×
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-23· cited 13×
- State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 7×
- State v. BoitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 6×
- Rogozhnikov v. Essex InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.