Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/16/2011
State v. Burgess
Citations
- 251 P.3d 765
- 240 Or. App. 641
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- crafting appropriate remedy when neither outright reversal nor entry of lesser included convic- tion was appropriate on plain error review “given the idio- syncratic procedural posture” of the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Edmonds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 63×
- State v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-11· cited 20×
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-07· cited 14×
- State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 10×
- State v. RaygosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-08· cited 7×
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 6×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-08· cited 4×
- Torres v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-15· cited 4×
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-29· cited 3×
- State v. BalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 2×
- State v. RyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 1×
- State v. PozosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-08-28· cited 1×
- State v. VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-26· cited 1×
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-08
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.