Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/29/1998
State v. Haney
Citations
- 153 Or. App. 642
- 958 P.2d 192
- 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- search of the defendant’s bag was not justified on officer safety grounds, pointing out that “[t]here was *** no evidence that defendant, who had been cooperative, made the officers fear for their safety”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, Haselton, Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-12· cited 212×
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 119×
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-21· cited 14×
- Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-08· cited 9×
- State v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-27· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.