Skip to main content

State v. Hammer

Citations

  • 213 N.E.3d 238
  • 2023 Ohio 1307

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to suppress where the warrantless seizure of appellant's person was based on probable cause. Although the officer who detained appellant did not have personal knowledge of the facts on which the probable cause was based, those facts were imputed to the officer via the collective knowledge doctrine. State v. Armstead, 2015-Ohio-5010, 50 N.E.3d 1073 (2d Dist.), overruled. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.