State v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant receives no credit for the day of sentencing
• stating defendant not entitled to credit for day sentence is imposed if it is the first day of defendant’s sentence
• “Where the date sentence is imposed serves . . . as the first day of sentence . . . it does not also count for presentence credit . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carnegie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-13· cited 35×
• State v. Cuen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-12· cited 33×
• State v. Ritch
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-05-09· cited 30×
• Soto v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-15· cited 13×
• State v. Snider
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-07-23· cited 8×
• State v. Clements
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-06-29· cited 8×
• State v. Lopez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-04-30· cited 8×
• State v. Yug
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-11-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pena
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-20· cited 50×
• State v. Pena
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-07· cited 38×
• State v. Salazar
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-09-16· cited 23×
• State v. Sutton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-04-18· cited 20×
• State v. Warde
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-10-13· cited 16×