State v. Cuen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f we were to hold that the evidence of prior sexual misconduct in this case satisfies the criteria for admissibility under the . . . modus operandi exception, there would be nothing left of” the general prohibition in Rule 404(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).