State v. Hamilton

Citations

• 232 Conn. App. 809

Syllabus

Convicted, following a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver, the defendant appealed. He claimed that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress certain evidence that had been seized from his apartment following the execution of a search warrant. Held: The trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to suppress as, applying the totality of the circumstances test, the search warrant application contained sufficient information from which the court reasonably could have inferred that there was a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime would be found at the defendant's apartment. Argued March 7—officially released May 27, 2025