State v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It has long been the rule in this state that drug offenses are not crimes involving dishonesty and, therefore, cannot be admitted for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of a witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Giddens
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-10· cited 50×
• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 17×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-05-31· cited 126×
• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1988-04-29· cited 63×
• State v. Cheun-Phon Ji
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-05-22· cited 62×
• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 49×
• State v. Milum
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-12-08· cited 24×