Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/28/2017

State v. Hall

Citations

2017 Ohio 2577

Syllabus

The trial court's decision that R.C. 2941.401 time limits had been met was not contrary to law. Trial counsel was not so ineffective as to deprive appellant of meaningful representation because no error on record resulted in prejudice or precluded him from entering a knowing, voluntary plea.

Judges: Singer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-19· cited 17×
State v. Willis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-08· cited 9×
State v. Stansberry
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-11· cited 3×
State v. Holz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-03· cited 2×
State v. Jama
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-12· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Kelley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
State v. Hester
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
State v. Hairston
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-03-17· cited 197×
State v. Palmer
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-02-14· cited 95×
State v. Ellis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-09· cited 8×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.